Living Evidence Compendium

The Universal & Atomic Elements of Organization

A falsifiable scientific theory proposing that the same irreducible structures organize both thought and reality — from the quantum to the social scale.

What if the same structures that organize your thoughts also organize the world? Explore the hypothesis

O-Theory proposes that four irreducible structures — Distinctions, Systems, Relationships and Perspectives (DSRP) — form the universal grammar of organization. Rather than being merely useful ways of thinking, these structures are hypothesized to be the atomic elements from which every organized phenomenon emerges, whether in cognition, biology, physics, mathematics, society, or the cosmos.

DS RP
DistinctionsSystemsRelationshipsPerspectives
Identity ↔ OtherPart ↔ Whole Action ↔ ReactionPoint ↔ View
D := (i ↔ o)S := (p ↔ w) R := (a ↔ r)P := (ṗ ↔ v)

This is a living scientific evidence compendium: an open, continually evolving collection of independent empirical research, formal theory, mathematical proofs, cross-disciplinary analyses, applications, critiques, and proposed falsifications. Every entry is included because it supports, refines, challenges, or attempts to falsify the theory.

Scientific theories are strengthened not only by evidence that confirms their predictions, but also by surviving attempts to falsify them. This compendium brings both together: independent evidence from researchers who were not testing DSRP and proposed counterexamples evaluated against the formal theory.

One counterexample is enough to falsify O-Theory. Until then, the question remains: do the same four structures organize everything from quantum systems to human thought?

Try a demonstration yourself Why is this convergent evidence compelling? See why independent convergence is one of science’s strongest forms of evidence.

independent opportunities for the theory to fail.

Independent convergence is one of the strongest forms of scientific evidence because researchers arrive at the same conclusion while investigating different questions for different reasons.

The number is not the point. Researchers in different fields, studying different questions with different methods, repeatedly arrived at the same structural predictions—almost always without testing DSRP or using its language.

Discipline
Field

No studies match your search

Try a different term or clear the filters.

About this collection

This compendium began as the peer-reviewed literature review “A Literature Review of the Universal and Atomic Elements of Complex Cognition,” published in the Journal of Systems Thinking with 109 studies. That paper is the peer-reviewed foundation. What you see here is its living, continuously updated version . New studies are checked before they are added, and the collection now holds and keeps growing. Open any card to see what the researchers found, why it bears on DSRP, and where the original review discusses it, the fuller account.

Cabrera, D., Cabrera, L., & Cabrera, E. A Literature Review of the Universal and Atomic Elements of Complex Cognition. Journal of Systems Thinking. · Cornell University & Cabrera Research Lab.

How to cite this collection

APA
BibTeX

The collection is updated continuously, so the citation carries the date you consulted it rather than a study count — the count changes weekly, and putting it in the reference would make the same collection look like a different work to everyone who cites it. To cite a single claim or study, use its own address: every one has a permanent link.

About this record

This is the adversarial half of the compendium. Where the evidence track asks what converges on DSRP, this one asks what would end it: a single organized phenomenon whose structure needs a fifth pattern, a ninth element, or a fifth structural dynamic. It holds written up from candidates across territories, and resolutions — the general answers those cases settle against. Every case is published whether it held or failed, including the ones still open.

How to cite the counterexamples and resolutions

APA
BibTeX

Cite this rather than the evidence collection when the point is what survived attack. The two are separate works with separate addresses: one asks what converges on the theory, the other asks what would end it, and a reference to the first does not support a claim about the second. Case and resolution numbers change when the record is revised, so cite a case by its own permanent link rather than by number.

Know of work that belongs here?

This collection is meant to keep growing. Send us a study, paper, book or critique that bears on DSRP, whether it supports the theory or cuts against it, and we will read it and decide whether it belongs.

 

DSRP Evidence

HIFa Targeted for VHL-Mediated Destruction by Proline Hydroxylation: Implications for O2 Sensing

Details

Authors Ivan et. al.

Year 2001

Publisher Science

Discipline Biology

Read it at the publisher 10.1126/science.1059817

In authors' words

Abstract

HIF (hypoxia-inducible factor) is a transcription factor that plays a pivotal role in cellular adaptation to changes in oxygen availability. In the presence of oxygen, HIF is targeted for destruction by an E3 ubiquitin ligase containing the von Hippel–Lindau tumor suppressor protein (pVHL). We found that human pVHL binds to a short HIF-derived peptide when a conserved proline residue at the core of this peptide is hydroxylated. Because proline hydroxylation requires molecular oxygen and Fe 2+ , this protein modification may play a key role in mammalian oxygen sensing.

What they set out to do (purpose)

How do cells sense the levels of ambiant oxygen in their environemnts?

What they found (results)

Cells have an awarness of their environments that is brought upon by stimuli.

Commentary

In short

Non-neural entities such as cells have the ability to make distinctions, speaking to the fundamentality of the D,S,R, and P patterns.

In more detail

Ivan et al 2001 researched how cells are able to sense the levels of ambient oxygen in their environment and react to them, for which they were awarded the 2019 Nobel Prize in Medicine. Specific cellular processes like this one are an example of how Distinctions, Relationships, Perspectives, and Systems may not be merely a pattern of mind, but a pattern of life. Ivan et al. looked at how HIFs

(hypoxia-inducible factors) are a factor that plays an essential role in cellular adaptations to oxygen changes in the environment. HIF binds to DNA to stabilize it in a hypoxic environment, leading to the expression of genes that promote processes like angiogenesis and glucose metabolism. Ivan et al. looked at the relationship between HIF and Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) disease. VHL is a cancer that is characterized by the development of highly vascular tumors. The protein pVHL in humans is linked to a compound that regulates HIF. It binds with short HIF peptides when the core of the HIF peptide is hydroxylated and destroys it. This core is made up of prolines, which require oxygen and iron to become hydroxylated. Overall, the fact that non-neural entities such as cells are able to make distinctions is not necessarily the most remarkable thing about this discovery. What is remarkable is that every little system in the bodies of all species is based on the ability to perform the D, S, R, and P functions. Thus, the universality of the DSRP functions across all living organisms becomes apparent.

Patterns it shows D, S, R, P

How to cite this Ivan et. al. (2001). HIFa Targeted for VHL-Mediated Destruction by Proline Hydroxylation: Implications for O2 Sensing. Science.