The Universal & Atomic Elements of Organization
A falsifiable scientific theory proposing that the same irreducible structures organize both thought and reality — from the quantum to the social scale.
O-Theory proposes that four irreducible structures — Distinctions, Systems, Relationships and Perspectives (DSRP) — form the universal grammar of organization. Rather than being merely useful ways of thinking, these structures are hypothesized to be the atomic elements from which every organized phenomenon emerges, whether in cognition, biology, physics, mathematics, society, or the cosmos.
| D | S | R | P |
| Distinctions | Systems | Relationships | Perspectives |
| Identity ↔ Other | Part ↔ Whole | Action ↔ Reaction | Point ↔ View |
| D := (i ↔ o) | S := (p ↔ w) | R := (a ↔ r) | P := (ṗ ↔ v) |
This is a living scientific evidence compendium: an open, continually evolving collection of independent empirical research, formal theory, mathematical proofs, cross-disciplinary analyses, applications, critiques, and proposed falsifications. Every entry is included because it supports, refines, challenges, or attempts to falsify the theory.
Scientific theories are strengthened not only by evidence that confirms their predictions, but also by surviving attempts to falsify them. This compendium brings both together: independent evidence from researchers who were not testing DSRP and proposed counterexamples evaluated against the formal theory.
One counterexample is enough to falsify O-Theory. Until then, the question remains: do the same four structures organize everything from quantum systems to human thought?
Independent convergence is one of the strongest forms of scientific evidence because researchers arrive at the same conclusion while investigating different questions for different reasons.
The number is not the point. Researchers in different fields, studying different questions with different methods, repeatedly arrived at the same structural predictions—almost always without testing DSRP or using its language.
Try a different term or clear the filters.
This compendium began as the peer-reviewed literature review “A Literature Review of the Universal and Atomic Elements of Complex Cognition,” published in the Journal of Systems Thinking with 109 studies. That paper is the peer-reviewed foundation. What you see here is its living, continuously updated version . New studies are checked before they are added, and the collection now holds and keeps growing. Open any card to see what the researchers found, why it bears on DSRP, and where the original review discusses it, the fuller account.
The collection is updated continuously, so the citation carries the date you consulted it rather than a study count — the count changes weekly, and putting it in the reference would make the same collection look like a different work to everyone who cites it. To cite a single claim or study, use its own address: every one has a permanent link.
This is the adversarial half of the compendium. Where the evidence track asks what converges on DSRP, this one asks what would end it: a single organized phenomenon whose structure needs a fifth pattern, a ninth element, or a fifth structural dynamic. It holds written up from candidates across territories, and resolutions — the general answers those cases settle against. Every case is published whether it held or failed, including the ones still open.
Cite this rather than the evidence collection when the point is what survived attack. The two are separate works with separate addresses: one asks what converges on the theory, the other asks what would end it, and a reference to the first does not support a claim about the second. Case and resolution numbers change when the record is revised, so cite a case by its own permanent link rather than by number.
This collection is meant to keep growing. Send us a study, paper, book or critique that bears on DSRP, whether it supports the theory or cuts against it, and we will read it and decide whether it belongs.
Authors Rebecca A. Lewis-Merrill et al.
Year 2026
Publisher The Astrophysical Journal
Kind of work article
Discipline Astronomy
Read it at the publisher 10.3847/1538-4357/ae878c
We report the first proper motion and acceleration measurements of the infrared (IR) counterpart to Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*-IR), the supermassive black hole at the center of our Galaxy, in the Gaia Celestial Reference Frame 3 (Gaia-CRF3). This reference frame realizes the International Celestial Reference System, which is an absolute reference coordinate system defined by quasars. A combination of Gaia and Hubble Space Telescope data was used to transform Keck adaptive optics observations into Gaia-CRF3. We find the proper motion of Sgr A*-IR in Gaia-CRF3 to be μα*=−3.093±0.085 mas/yr and μδ=−5.62±0.13 mas/yr. We also place a 2σ upper constraint of the acceleration of Sgr A*-IR on the sky at 0.061 mas yr−2. This acceleration limit excludes any intermediate-mass black hole companion with mass ≳4×10^4 M⊙ within a distance of ∼0.01 pc.
Precisely measure the motion of the Milky Way's central supermassive black hole in an absolute, quasar-defined coordinate frame and use it to test for a hidden companion black hole.
The infrared counterpart to Sagittarius A* at the Galactic Center, observed via Keck adaptive optics.
Combined Keck adaptive-optics astrometry with Gaia and Hubble Space Telescope data, using a custom reference-star selection method to transform observations into Gaia-CRF3.
The infrared counterpart to Sagittarius A* has a measured proper motion of −3.093 mas/yr (RA) and −5.62 mas/yr (Dec) in the Gaia-CRF3 absolute reference frame, with acceleration limits ruling out an intermediate-mass black hole companion more massive than ~4×10^4 solar masses within 0.01 parsecs.
The finding shows that an object's measured motion is inseparable from the reference frame chosen to describe it: the same black hole's motion is only meaningful once expressed within a specific adopted coordinate perspective.
Patterns it shows P
Shows the structure is there
Added 2026-09-16
How to cite this Rebecca A. Lewis-Merrill et al. (2026). Absolute Motion of the Infrared Counterpart to Sagittarius A* in the Gaia Celestial Reference Frame 3 and Limits on an Intermediate-mass Black Hole Companion. The Astrophysical Journal.