[DSRP Evidence](https://dsrpevidence.org/)

# Cabrera D, Cabrera L, Cabrera E (2022). Ball–Dot–Hole. Systems 10(3):52.

An experiment, N = 407, reported in [Perspectives Organize Information in Mind and Nature (P)](https://dsrpevidence.org/paper/337).

## How they did it (methods)

Shown one circle, choose ball, dot or hole; then say why not the others. The mirrored reversal of the Waldo design — here the view is supplied and the point is asked for. Badges: reversal design

## What they found (results)

Ball 60.7%, hole 34.9%, dot 4.4%. Choice tracked the coded reason: 72.7% of those reasoning from 'boundary' chose hole.

[Read the paper it appeared in](https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10030052)