[DSRP Evidence](https://dsrpevidence.org/)

# Senior Bureaucrats, Coalitions and the Quality of Government: Accounting for Effective Governance in Fragmented Settings

Borges et al., 2026, Governance — Political Science

Patterns: [Systems](https://dsrpevidence.org/pattern/systems), [Relationships](https://dsrpevidence.org/pattern/relationships)

## In short

The effect of cabinet fragmentation depends on how it interacts with bureaucratic recruitment structures, demonstrating that governance quality emerges from relationships among nested systems rather than from either factor in isolation, independently instantiating Relationship and System.

## What they found (results)

Analyzing expert survey data from 89 democracies, the authors found that cabinet fragmentation worsens governance when senior bureaucrats are politically appointed, but is associated with higher governance quality when appointments are career-based and internally promoted.

## Abstract

Debates over the consequences of party and cabinet fragmentation for government performance remain unsettled. While some scholars argue that coalition governments foster instability and rent‐seeking, others contend that they enhance accountability and inclusion. This article argues that the effects of cabinet fragmentation depend on the rules of recruitment and promotion of the senior civil service. Using data from the Quality of Government Expert Survey covering 89 democracies, we examine how fragmentation interacts with both bureaucratic politicization and bureaucratic career systems. The results show that fragmentation amplifies the negative effects of politicized senior appointments, although we find limited evidence that fragmentation itself reduces the quality of government under high politicization. By contrast, fragmented cabinets are associated with more effective governance in the presence of career‐based structures characterized by internal recruitment of senior bureaucrats and long‐term careers. The findings highlight the importance of bureaucratic career structures for effective governance in multiparty systems.

These researchers were not testing DSRP. The finding is theirs; the correspondence to DSRP is drawn by this site.

[Source](https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70148)